Os (des)caminhos da Educação do Campo em Campos dos Goytacazes: uma análise das políticas públicas educacionais
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17648/diversitas-journal-v6i1-1575Abstract
ABSTRACT: The history of Brazilian education shows that education projects designed for the countryside do not consider social capital and the particularities of rural territories. Thus emphasizing the arenas of power between the ruling class and the working class. In the field of educational public policies, tensions are concentrated in the discontinuities of government actions aimed at improving rural education. Brazil adopts educational plans that do not match the reality of the people of the countryside, however the public policies conquered in the last decades were an important step in the struggle for the security of working class rights.Given the above, the present research project aims to: analyze the implementation of public policies on Rural Education in the municipality of Campos dos Goytacazes, in order to promote the development of peasant territories. For that, qualitative research was chosen as a methodological approach. Among the technical procedures adopted, bibliographic and documentary research, interviews with subjects related to Rural Education in the municipality and Caderneta de Campo, as an auxiliary tool for the systematization of data, stand out. The survey results showed that the Municipality of Campos dos Goytacazes accesses resources for the implementation of programs aimed at Rural Education, but due to the lack of “political will”, the subjects of the countryside continue to be invisible. In order to mitigate the harmful effects of the educational paradigm, it is suggested, for example, the effective implementation of the Rural Education matrix, approved in 2016, by the municipality. The adoption of the matrix in question will contribute to the promotion of a more significant teaching-learning process for students in the field, since it places them as protagonists of the training process.
KEYWORD: Peasantry, public policies, territory.
Metrics
References
BRASIL. Parecer CNE/CEB n° 1, de 02 fevereiro de 2006. In: Brasil. Ministério da Educação. Secretaria de Educação Continuada, Alfabetização, Diversidade e Inclusão –SECADI. Educação do Campo: Marcos Normativos. Brasília: SECADI, 2012. 96p.
BRASIL. Parecer CNE/CEBn° 1, de 02 fevereiro de 2006. In: Brasil. Ministério da Educação. Secretaria de Educação Continuada, Alfabetização, Diversidade e Inclusão –SECADI. Educação do Campo: Marcos Normativos. Brasília: SECADI, 2012. 96p.
BRASIL. Decreto n° 6.755, de 29 de janeiro de 2009. In: Brasil. Ministério da Educação. Secretaria de Educação Continuada, Alfabetização, Diversidade e Inclusão –SECADI. Educação do Campo: Marcos Normativos. Brasília: SECADI, 2012. 96p.
CALDART, R. S. Educação do Campo. In: CALDART, R. S.;PEREIRA, I. B.; ALENTEJANO, P.; FRIGOTTO, G. (Orgs.). Dicionário de Educação do Campo. Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo: Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venâncio, Expressão Popular, 2012.
CARAVACA, I. B.; GONZÁLEZ, R. G. Las redes de colaboración como base del desarrollo territorial. Scripta Nova: Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales, Barcelona, v. 13, n. 289, 1 mayo 2009.
GRANOVETTER, M. S. The Strength of Weak Ties. The American Journal of Sociology, vol. 78. N° 6 (May, 1973) 1360-1380.
___________________. The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 1. Winter 2005. Pages 33–50.
MOLINA, M. C.; SÁ, L. M. Escola do Campo. In: CALDART, R. S.; PEREIRA, I. B.; ALENTEJANO, P.; FRIGOTTO, G. (Orgs.). Dicionário de Educação do Campo. Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo: Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venâncio, Expressão Popular, 2012.
SANTOS, C. A. Dos. Programa Nacional de Educação na Reforma Agrária (PRONERA). In: Dicionário de Educação do Campo. CALDART, R. S.; PEREIRA, I. B.; ALENTEJANO, P.; FRIGOTTO, G. Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo: Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venâncio, Expressão Popular, 2012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Viviane Cristina Silva Lima
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Diversitas Journal expresses that the articles are the sole responsibility of the Authors, who are familiar with Brazilian and international legislation.
Articles are peer-reviewed and care should be taken to warn of the possible incidence of plagiarism. However, plagiarism is an indisputable action by the authors.
The violation of copyright is a crime, provided for in article 184 of the Brazilian Penal Code: “Art. 184 Violating copyright and related rights: Penalty - detention, from 3 (three) months to 1 (one) year, or fine. § 1 If the violation consists of total or partial reproduction, for the purpose of direct or indirect profit, by any means or process, of intellectual work, interpretation, performance or phonogram, without the express authorization of the author, the performer, the producer , as the case may be, or whoever represents them: Penalty - imprisonment, from 2 (two) to 4 (four) years, and a fine. ”
.png){kind=logo}
